Women's PJ Pant In Organic Cotton
Women's PJ Pant In Organic Cotton is rated out of 5 by 5.
Rated 5 out of 5 by Sherman 45 from Soft and high-waisted Most comfy winter weight pj’s ever. I only wish there were sold colors
Date published: 2018-05-21
Rated 4 out of 5 by Knd110 from Stretchy! I have a pair of the christmas women’s pjs from this year and love them, so I thought I would pick up another pair for the spring. The Christmas ones get pretty stretched out after a few wears, but these ones are baggy and saggy all over after a few hours. Thankfully they hold up well to washing, because I wash/dry them constantly. These are pretty much the only thing I own that I prefer straight out of a dryer. I still like them, but I will definitely size down for the next pair. For reference, I’m 5’6, 135lbs, and got a medium.
Date published: 2018-05-16
Rated 5 out of 5 by FosterMama217 from Great fit. So comfy. I like these pj bottoms a bit better than the long john sets. It seems like a better design for a woman’s shape vs the unisex design of the others. Great quality. So comfy. A little too thick for hot summer months but great for winter and fall.
Date published: 2018-05-08
Rated 3 out of 5 by MTPED from Cute but not great I bought a women's XS. I wear a 25/26 113lb, 5'3" with a 32 inch leg inseam. These are much shorter than the child's size 14 which I bought for my son. I take his pants and wear them because I don't really like how the women's ones fit me and how they ride up at the bottom. The Child's 14 is higher in the waist but longer in the leg and more fitted which I personally like. Hope this helps. No, I will not buy this pant again but everyone's body is different.
Date published: 2018-01-26
Rated 3 out of 5 by Julia K from Comfy and cute but too large and stretches These are very soft and comfortable. But, I got the XS size (normally a size 26) and they are definitely too big. They seemed okay so I took the tags off but they sag very significantly in the bottom and thighs area. I tried washing and drying them but they are still too big. The Long John version of these same pants in XS is a bit tighter but definitely still has lots of room in the bottom area.
Date published: 2017-12-24
- bvseo_sdk, dw_cartridge, 16.1.1, p_sdk_3.2.0
- CLOUD, getContent, 14ms
- reviews, product